Determining Actual Grinding Productivity & Cost

By evaluating and tracking abrasive performance, combined with taking the time to select the best abrasive for a particular application, job shops and production operations can identify opportunities to significantly decrease grinding costs and increase productivity.

Job shops as well as production-manufacturing operations will find that the abrasive products outfitted to their hand-held power tools can play a crucial role in increasing productivity. Often viewed as a negligible expense, abrasives comprise on average less than two percent of the total cost of a fabricating operation.

However, most shops fail to realize that 10 to 15 percent of their labor is consumed in metal-fabrication and finishing operations. So, rather than simply considering the direct cost on the distributor’s product invoice, a more accurate measure of productivity would be to look at the true total process cost, or the total work to be performed with abrasives.

The abrasive grain is a cutting tool. Performance grains deliver benefits such as higher stock-removal rates, increased product life, reduced metallurgical damage and less wear and tear on grinding machines. All of these factors work to minimize the total cost of the grinding process. The most competitive production operations evaluate these factors when making their purchasing decisions.

Abrasive grains can be made by several manufacturing methods — from large ingots in furnaces, crushed and then sorted by grit size and shape to be used in abrasive tools to manufactured using molding technology, which produces precision-shaped grain that offers a more uniform structure and size.

An overview and demonstration of how Zirconia Alumina grain cuts faster, lasts longer and outperforms the competition.

Precision-shaped grains generally cut quickly and perform well in precision metal-removal applications requiring tight tolerances and fine scratch patterns. However, it is important to consider the application at hand, as some characteristics of precision-shaped grains — such as grain orientation, grain hardness and friability — can make them less effective for rough grinding jobs.

Wheel manufacturers often expend considerable effort to develop a proprietary mixture of grains that will provide optimal performance. For example, in certain grinding- and cutting-wheel lines, Norton offers a proprietary blend of ceramic-alumina and zirconia-alumina grains. These proprietary grains microfracture as they break down, continuously exposing new cutting surfaces — essentially self-sharpening.

Compared to the grains on more traditional grinding wheels, these fresh cutting points provide a faster cut rate, higher rate of metal removal and longer wheel life, as the grains can be completely utilized through the microfracturing process. So, rather than prematurely expelling rounded or worn aluminum-oxide grains at only a fraction of their life, microstructure grains such as ceramic alumina and zirconia alumina work together to cut cooler, allowing the wheel to hold onto the grain longer to extend wheel life.

The key to optimizing performance of an abrasive-grinding and cutting operation is the selection of the best-suited wheel to the particular application. When selecting the best wheel for the job, consider several factors including external budgetary rules and the available power sources — low voltage, low air pressure for example — and whether cost reduction and process optimization throughput are the main goals.

There are several different methods of evaluating the performance of abrasive wheels.  Some wheels are hard-acting — they may last a long time but not remove much material. Other wheels are soft-acting — they cut quickly but do not last very long. To attain the true value of a wheel, combine its cutting action and wheel life. A high-performance wheel provides a very good cut rate and wheel life for the highest total metal removed over the life of the wheel.  Measuring and tracking these factors can reveal opportunities to reduce the total cost of an operation, solving production bottlenecks and reducing total fabrication costs.

To illustrate how to measure and compare total wheel performance, consider the accompanying graph comparing the productivity of a wheel with precision-shaped grains and a wheel with a proprietary ceramic-alumina and zirconia-alumina mix. When compared during a standard grinding operation, the wheel containing precision-shaped grains cuts very quickly during the initial few minutes of grinding. However, since the grains cannot microfracture under the grinding pressure, the wheel will grind more slowly after several minutes. The grains prematurely expel and wear very quickly so that the final life of the wheel tends to be very short.

In contrast, the wheel with the proprietary mix of grains maintains the same cut rate throughout its life, which is nearly three times longer than the wheel with the precision-shaped grains. This is due to the microfracturing characteristics of the two grains. Over the life of the wheel, it removes more than 2.5 times the material than the wheel containing the precision-shaped grains.

Quantitative measures are important to apply to total cost evaluations but there are benefits that can be derived from using a fast-cutting wheel:

  •  Reduced labor cost;
  •  Shorter process times;
  •  Reduced worker fatigue.

By evaluating and tracking abrasive performance, combined with taking the time to select the best abrasive for a particular application, job shops and production operations can identify opportunities to significantly decrease grinding costs and increase productivity.

Debbie Gaspich

Debbie Gaspich is the director of product management for Thin Wheel and Construction Products at Norton | Saint-Gobain, 6600 Walmore Road, Niagara Falls, NY 14304, 716-731-7555,,